Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling. Zhang, B. H., Wagenbreth, G., Martin-Mayor, V., & Hen, I. Scientific Reports, 7(1):1044, 2017. ![Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex The debate around the potential superiority of quantum annealers over their classical counterparts has been ongoing since the inception of the field. Recent technological breakthroughs, which have led to the manufacture of experimental prototypes of quantum annealing optimizers with sizes approaching the practical regime, have reignited this discussion. However, the demonstration of quantum annealing speedups remains to this day an elusive albeit coveted goal. We examine the power of quantum annealers to provide a different type of quantum enhancement of practical relevance, namely, their ability to serve as useful samplers from the ground-state manifolds of combinatorial optimization problems. We study, both numerically by simulating stoquastic and non-stoquastic quantum annealing processes, and experimentally, using a prototypical quantum annealing processor, the ability of quantum annealers to sample the ground-states of spin glasses differently than thermal samplers. We demonstrate that (i) quantum annealers sample the ground-state manifolds of spin glasses very differently than thermal optimizers (ii) the nature of the quantum fluctuations driving the annealing process has a decisive effect on the final distribution, and (iii) the experimental quantum annealer samples ground-state manifolds significantly differently than thermal and ideal quantum annealers. We illustrate how quantum annealers may serve as powerful tools when complementing standard sampling algorithms.
@article{Zhang,
Abstract = {The debate around the potential superiority of quantum annealers over their classical counterparts has been ongoing since the inception of the field. Recent technological breakthroughs, which have led to the manufacture of experimental prototypes of quantum annealing optimizers with sizes approaching the practical regime, have reignited this discussion. However, the demonstration of quantum annealing speedups remains to this day an elusive albeit coveted goal. We examine the power of quantum annealers to provide a different type of quantum enhancement of practical relevance, namely, their ability to serve as useful samplers from the ground-state manifolds of combinatorial optimization problems. We study, both numerically by simulating stoquastic and non-stoquastic quantum annealing processes, and experimentally, using a prototypical quantum annealing processor, the ability of quantum annealers to sample the ground-states of spin glasses differently than thermal samplers. We demonstrate that (i) quantum annealers sample the ground-state manifolds of spin glasses very differently than thermal optimizers (ii) the nature of the quantum fluctuations driving the annealing process has a decisive effect on the final distribution, and (iii) the experimental quantum annealer samples ground-state manifolds significantly differently than thermal and ideal quantum annealers. We illustrate how quantum annealers may serve as powerful tools when complementing standard sampling algorithms.},
Author = {Zhang, Brian Hu and Wagenbreth, Gene and Martin-Mayor, Victor and Hen, Itay},
Da = {2017/04/21},
Date-Added = {2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000},
Date-Modified = {2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000},
Doi = {10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},
Id = {Zhang2017},
Isbn = {2045-2322},
Journal = {Scientific Reports},
Number = {1},
Pages = {1044},
Title = {Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling},
Ty = {JOUR},
Url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},
Volume = {7},
Year = {2017},
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},
Bdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"o9vYnL8r6WdAdugaR","bibbaseid":"zhang-wagenbreth-martinmayor-hen-advantagesofunfairquantumgroundstatesampling-2017","author_short":["Zhang, B. H.","Wagenbreth, G.","Martin-Mayor, V.","Hen, I."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"The debate around the potential superiority of quantum annealers over their classical counterparts has been ongoing since the inception of the field. Recent technological breakthroughs, which have led to the manufacture of experimental prototypes of quantum annealing optimizers with sizes approaching the practical regime, have reignited this discussion. However, the demonstration of quantum annealing speedups remains to this day an elusive albeit coveted goal. We examine the power of quantum annealers to provide a different type of quantum enhancement of practical relevance, namely, their ability to serve as useful samplers from the ground-state manifolds of combinatorial optimization problems. We study, both numerically by simulating stoquastic and non-stoquastic quantum annealing processes, and experimentally, using a prototypical quantum annealing processor, the ability of quantum annealers to sample the ground-states of spin glasses differently than thermal samplers. We demonstrate that (i) quantum annealers sample the ground-state manifolds of spin glasses very differently than thermal optimizers (ii) the nature of the quantum fluctuations driving the annealing process has a decisive effect on the final distribution, and (iii) the experimental quantum annealer samples ground-state manifolds significantly differently than thermal and ideal quantum annealers. We illustrate how quantum annealers may serve as powerful tools when complementing standard sampling algorithms.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zhang"],"firstnames":["Brian","Hu"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wagenbreth"],"firstnames":["Gene"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Martin-Mayor"],"firstnames":["Victor"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hen"],"firstnames":["Itay"],"suffixes":[]}],"da":"2017/04/21","date-added":"2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000","date-modified":"2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000","doi":"10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6","id":"Zhang2017","isbn":"2045-2322","journal":"Scientific Reports","number":"1","pages":"1044","title":"Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling","ty":"JOUR","url":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6","volume":"7","year":"2017","bdsk-url-1":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6","bdsk-url-2":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6","bibtex":"@article{Zhang,\n\tAbstract = {The debate around the potential superiority of quantum annealers over their classical counterparts has been ongoing since the inception of the field. Recent technological breakthroughs, which have led to the manufacture of experimental prototypes of quantum annealing optimizers with sizes approaching the practical regime, have reignited this discussion. However, the demonstration of quantum annealing speedups remains to this day an elusive albeit coveted goal. We examine the power of quantum annealers to provide a different type of quantum enhancement of practical relevance, namely, their ability to serve as useful samplers from the ground-state manifolds of combinatorial optimization problems. We study, both numerically by simulating stoquastic and non-stoquastic quantum annealing processes, and experimentally, using a prototypical quantum annealing processor, the ability of quantum annealers to sample the ground-states of spin glasses differently than thermal samplers. We demonstrate that (i) quantum annealers sample the ground-state manifolds of spin glasses very differently than thermal optimizers (ii) the nature of the quantum fluctuations driving the annealing process has a decisive effect on the final distribution, and (iii) the experimental quantum annealer samples ground-state manifolds significantly differently than thermal and ideal quantum annealers. We illustrate how quantum annealers may serve as powerful tools when complementing standard sampling algorithms.},\n\tAuthor = {Zhang, Brian Hu and Wagenbreth, Gene and Martin-Mayor, Victor and Hen, Itay},\n\tDa = {2017/04/21},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-04-10 17:04:23 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},\n\tId = {Zhang2017},\n\tIsbn = {2045-2322},\n\tJournal = {Scientific Reports},\n\tNumber = {1},\n\tPages = {1044},\n\tTitle = {Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling},\n\tTy = {JOUR},\n\tUrl = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},\n\tVolume = {7},\n\tYear = {2017},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6},\n\tBdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6}}\n\n","author_short":["Zhang, B. H.","Wagenbreth, G.","Martin-Mayor, V.","Hen, I."],"bibbaseid":"zhang-wagenbreth-martinmayor-hen-advantagesofunfairquantumgroundstatesampling-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01096-6"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/6moQXZADybdshmwar/itayhen.bib","dataSources":["Z6jWac7o9Cbcwv4Kf","CSYFA7qwQGMgrz3JD"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["advantages","unfair","quantum","ground","state","sampling","zhang","wagenbreth","martin-mayor","hen"],"title":"Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling","year":2017}