QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine: Development and Validation. Zheng, J. & Yu, H. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2):e12525, 2019. ![QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine: Development and Validation [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Background: A plethora of health literacy instruments was developed over the decades. They usually start with experts curating passages of text or word lists, followed by psychometric validation and revision based on test results obtained from a sample population. This process is costly and it is difficult to customize for new usage scenarios. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a framework for dynamically creating test instruments that can provide a focused assessment of patients’ health literacy. Methods: A health literacy framework and scoring method were extended from the vocabulary knowledge test to accommodate a wide range of item difficulties and various degrees of uncertainty in the participant’s answer. Web-based tests from Amazon Mechanical Turk users were used to assess reliability and validity. Results: Parallel forms of our tests showed high reliability (correlation=.78; 95% CI 0.69-0.85). Validity measured as correlation with an electronic health record comprehension instrument was higher (.47-.61 among 3 groups) than 2 existing tools (Short Assessment of Health Literacy-English, .38-.43; Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, .34-.46). Our framework is able to distinguish higher literacy levels that are often not measured by other instruments. It is also flexible, allowing customizations to the test the designer’s focus on a particular interest in a subject matter or domain. The framework is among the fastest health literacy instrument to administer. Conclusions: We proposed a valid and highly reliable framework to dynamically create health literacy instruments, alleviating the need to repeat a time-consuming process when a new use scenario arises. This framework can be customized to a specific need on demand and can measure skills beyond the basic level. [J Med Internet Res 2019;21(2):e12525]
@article{zheng_quiklite_2019,
title = {{QuikLitE}, a {Framework} for {Quick} {Literacy} {Evaluation} in {Medicine}: {Development} and {Validation}},
volume = {21},
copyright = {Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work (},
shorttitle = {{QuikLitE}, a {Framework} for {Quick} {Literacy} {Evaluation} in {Medicine}},
url = {https://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12525/},
doi = {10.2196/jmir.12525},
abstract = {Background: A plethora of health literacy instruments was developed over the decades. They usually start with experts curating passages of text or word lists, followed by psychometric validation and revision based on test results obtained from a sample population. This process is costly and it is difficult to customize for new usage scenarios. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a framework for dynamically creating test instruments that can provide a focused assessment of patients’ health literacy. Methods: A health literacy framework and scoring method were extended from the vocabulary knowledge test to accommodate a wide range of item difficulties and various degrees of uncertainty in the participant’s answer. Web-based tests from Amazon Mechanical Turk users were used to assess reliability and validity. Results: Parallel forms of our tests showed high reliability (correlation=.78; 95\% CI 0.69-0.85). Validity measured as correlation with an electronic health record comprehension instrument was higher (.47-.61 among 3 groups) than 2 existing tools (Short Assessment of Health Literacy-English, .38-.43; Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, .34-.46). Our framework is able to distinguish higher literacy levels that are often not measured by other instruments. It is also flexible, allowing customizations to the test the designer’s focus on a particular interest in a subject matter or domain. The framework is among the fastest health literacy instrument to administer. Conclusions: We proposed a valid and highly reliable framework to dynamically create health literacy instruments, alleviating the need to repeat a time-consuming process when a new use scenario arises. This framework can be customized to a specific need on demand and can measure skills beyond the basic level. [J Med Internet Res 2019;21(2):e12525]},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2019-02-22},
journal = {Journal of Medical Internet Research},
author = {Zheng, Jiaping and Yu, Hong},
year = {2019},
pmid = {30794206 PMCID: 6406229},
pages = {e12525},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Jzr8ca5ouEuT5B6MH","bibbaseid":"zheng-yu-quikliteaframeworkforquickliteracyevaluationinmedicinedevelopmentandvalidation-2019","author_short":["Zheng, J.","Yu, H."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine: Development and Validation","volume":"21","copyright":"Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work (","shorttitle":"QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine","url":"https://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12525/","doi":"10.2196/jmir.12525","abstract":"Background: A plethora of health literacy instruments was developed over the decades. They usually start with experts curating passages of text or word lists, followed by psychometric validation and revision based on test results obtained from a sample population. This process is costly and it is difficult to customize for new usage scenarios. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a framework for dynamically creating test instruments that can provide a focused assessment of patients’ health literacy. Methods: A health literacy framework and scoring method were extended from the vocabulary knowledge test to accommodate a wide range of item difficulties and various degrees of uncertainty in the participant’s answer. Web-based tests from Amazon Mechanical Turk users were used to assess reliability and validity. Results: Parallel forms of our tests showed high reliability (correlation=.78; 95% CI 0.69-0.85). Validity measured as correlation with an electronic health record comprehension instrument was higher (.47-.61 among 3 groups) than 2 existing tools (Short Assessment of Health Literacy-English, .38-.43; Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, .34-.46). Our framework is able to distinguish higher literacy levels that are often not measured by other instruments. It is also flexible, allowing customizations to the test the designer’s focus on a particular interest in a subject matter or domain. The framework is among the fastest health literacy instrument to administer. Conclusions: We proposed a valid and highly reliable framework to dynamically create health literacy instruments, alleviating the need to repeat a time-consuming process when a new use scenario arises. This framework can be customized to a specific need on demand and can measure skills beyond the basic level. [J Med Internet Res 2019;21(2):e12525]","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2019-02-22","journal":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zheng"],"firstnames":["Jiaping"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yu"],"firstnames":["Hong"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2019","pmid":"30794206 PMCID: 6406229","pages":"e12525","bibtex":"@article{zheng_quiklite_2019,\n\ttitle = {{QuikLitE}, a {Framework} for {Quick} {Literacy} {Evaluation} in {Medicine}: {Development} and {Validation}},\n\tvolume = {21},\n\tcopyright = {Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work (},\n\tshorttitle = {{QuikLitE}, a {Framework} for {Quick} {Literacy} {Evaluation} in {Medicine}},\n\turl = {https://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12525/},\n\tdoi = {10.2196/jmir.12525},\n\tabstract = {Background: A plethora of health literacy instruments was developed over the decades. They usually start with experts curating passages of text or word lists, followed by psychometric validation and revision based on test results obtained from a sample population. This process is costly and it is difficult to customize for new usage scenarios. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a framework for dynamically creating test instruments that can provide a focused assessment of patients’ health literacy. Methods: A health literacy framework and scoring method were extended from the vocabulary knowledge test to accommodate a wide range of item difficulties and various degrees of uncertainty in the participant’s answer. Web-based tests from Amazon Mechanical Turk users were used to assess reliability and validity. Results: Parallel forms of our tests showed high reliability (correlation=.78; 95\\% CI 0.69-0.85). Validity measured as correlation with an electronic health record comprehension instrument was higher (.47-.61 among 3 groups) than 2 existing tools (Short Assessment of Health Literacy-English, .38-.43; Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, .34-.46). Our framework is able to distinguish higher literacy levels that are often not measured by other instruments. It is also flexible, allowing customizations to the test the designer’s focus on a particular interest in a subject matter or domain. The framework is among the fastest health literacy instrument to administer. Conclusions: We proposed a valid and highly reliable framework to dynamically create health literacy instruments, alleviating the need to repeat a time-consuming process when a new use scenario arises. This framework can be customized to a specific need on demand and can measure skills beyond the basic level. [J Med Internet Res 2019;21(2):e12525]},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2019-02-22},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Medical Internet Research},\n\tauthor = {Zheng, Jiaping and Yu, Hong},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpmid = {30794206 PMCID: 6406229},\n\tpages = {e12525},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Zheng, J.","Yu, H."],"key":"zheng_quiklite_2019","id":"zheng_quiklite_2019","bibbaseid":"zheng-yu-quikliteaframeworkforquickliteracyevaluationinmedicinedevelopmentandvalidation-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12525/"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://fenway.cs.uml.edu/papers/pubs-all.bib","dataSources":["TqaA9miSB65nRfS5H"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["quiklite","framework","quick","literacy","evaluation","medicine","development","validation","zheng","yu"],"title":"QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine: Development and Validation","year":2019}