Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry. Casella, E., Drechsel, J., Winter, C., Benninghoff, M., & Rovere, A. Geo-Marine Letters, 40(2):255-268, 2020. ![Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry [pdf]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "pdf")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m2 min−1. Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.
@article{
title = {Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry},
type = {article},
year = {2020},
pages = {255-268},
volume = {40},
id = {beb9ab2e-5960-3709-b0c6-2feba1106ffc},
created = {2020-06-30T15:50:14.651Z},
file_attached = {true},
profile_id = {58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376},
last_modified = {2020-06-30T15:52:05.824Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {true},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Casella2020},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m2 min−1. Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Casella, Elisa and Drechsel, Jan and Winter, Christian and Benninghoff, Markus and Rovere, Alessio},
doi = {10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8},
journal = {Geo-Marine Letters},
number = {2}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"rzdE5gTTdgWqPpwu2","bibbaseid":"casella-drechsel-winter-benninghoff-rovere-accuracyofsandbeachtopographysurveyingbydronesandphotogrammetry-2020","authorIDs":["2FbnRctuL6qzRRA7H","AnFxtfnHEPyTjBY77","BRaTKMpCTpPQefMD2","BT9aYnhHJvFDCrcM3","CiTLikPWD4bj3TnSZ","JfWAnPuWYDRF2urdg","NaZ8dLTLPyQSp9EhC","Twb4Z6EfTQYZQ5J8w","TyMgZPczjBfDFTKfn","WXdYF4vPxfbvBsEAb","X9x9sFSytypeadrTs","fmi2ESaAtwPnkmLZs","mwQHumpRF952Yh7E5","prGqtgJdSGtqFGuxD","qhMqcfmKShypjknvm","sAFS5knCHsRqe3j9D","tQSKp3zfSvAXngfym","tR8ZCZePMgKmvxKzG","xJ6fuLqjSbg3TAsHx"],"author_short":["Casella, E.","Drechsel, J.","Winter, C.","Benninghoff, M.","Rovere, A."],"bibdata":{"title":"Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry","type":"article","year":"2020","pages":"255-268","volume":"40","id":"beb9ab2e-5960-3709-b0c6-2feba1106ffc","created":"2020-06-30T15:50:14.651Z","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376","last_modified":"2020-06-30T15:52:05.824Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Casella2020","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m2 min−1. Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.","bibtype":"article","author":"Casella, Elisa and Drechsel, Jan and Winter, Christian and Benninghoff, Markus and Rovere, Alessio","doi":"10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8","journal":"Geo-Marine Letters","number":"2","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n pages = {255-268},\n volume = {40},\n id = {beb9ab2e-5960-3709-b0c6-2feba1106ffc},\n created = {2020-06-30T15:50:14.651Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376},\n last_modified = {2020-06-30T15:52:05.824Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Casella2020},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Beaches are characterized by high morphodynamic activity, and high-frequency measurements are needed to understand their states and rates of change. Ideally, beach survey methods should be at once accurate, rapid and low-cost. Recently, unmanned aerial systems (drones) have been increasingly utilized to measure beach topography. In this paper, we present a review of the state of art in drones and photogrammetry for beach surveys and the respective achieved measurement quality (where reported). We then show how drones with a minimal configuration and a low-cost setup can meet the high accuracy and rapidity required for beach surveys. To test a minimal drone and ground control point configuration, we used consumer-grade equipment to perform the same flight path with different cameras and at different altitudes. We then used photogrammetry to produce digital elevation models of the beach. Using a GNSS-RTK system, we collected 2950 independent control points to evaluate the accuracy of the digital elevation models. Results show that, once a few potential sources of uncertainties in the final digital elevation model are taken into account, the average RMSE(z) of the digital elevation models was ~5 cm, with a survey efficiency of ca. 3 m2 min−1. Digital elevation models taken at different times were used to calculate the before–after sediment budget following a storm that hit a sandy coast in Sylt Island at the German North Sea coast.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Casella, Elisa and Drechsel, Jan and Winter, Christian and Benninghoff, Markus and Rovere, Alessio},\n doi = {10.1007/s00367-020-00638-8},\n journal = {Geo-Marine Letters},\n number = {2}\n}","author_short":["Casella, E.","Drechsel, J.","Winter, C.","Benninghoff, M.","Rovere, A."],"urls":{"Paper":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376/file/3c0ae310-bd93-7b13-3ee9-8fce7320ca2c/Geo_Marine_Letters___Accuracy_of_sand_beach_topography_surveying_by_drones_and_photogrammetry.pdf.pdf"},"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376","bibbaseid":"casella-drechsel-winter-benninghoff-rovere-accuracyofsandbeachtopographysurveyingbydronesandphotogrammetry-2020","role":"author","metadata":{"authorlinks":{"rovere, a":"https://alerov.weebly.com/","rovere, a":"https://www.marum.de/Prof.-Dr.-alessio-rovere.html"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2020-07-01T10:18:25.544Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["accuracy","sand","beach","topography","surveying","drones","photogrammetry","casella","drechsel","winter","benninghoff","rovere"],"title":"Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry","year":2020,"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/58d47d98-a4f4-3ac1-a79d-2d252a797376","dataSources":["yjwCZ6rRi5QrwatHg","ya2CyA73rpZseyrZ8","2252seNhipfTmjEBQ"]}