Open Science Is Robust Science. McAbee, S. T., Grubbs, J. B., & Zickar, M. J. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(1):54–61, April, 2018.
Open Science Is Robust Science [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   1 download  
Grand et al. (2018) provide a critical treatment of the need for industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists to take active steps to ensure that ours is a robust and reliable science of organizations, the spirit of which the present authors wholeheartedly agree. One path toward ensuring that I-O psychology is rightly recognized as a robust science is by embracing the principles of Open Science. We argue that the move toward Open Science is beneficial for all six of the defining principles outlined by Grand et al. Open Science increases transparency, facilitates replication, and contributes to the accumulation and integration of research by increasing accessibility. Each of these factors helps to foster systematic, rigorous scientific practices, which, in turn, can lead to greater insights and understanding of organizational phenomenon through deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches to theory generation and refinement, ensuring that our field remains relevant for the foreseeable future. In this commentary, we highlight several initiatives that already exist to promote Open Science and explore others only alluded to by Grand et al.
@article{mcabee_open_2018,
	title = {Open {Science} {Is} {Robust} {Science}},
	volume = {11},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	issn = {1754-9426, 1754-9434},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology/article/open-science-is-robust-science/EE1AA08059145362E95400292EB470A7},
	doi = {10.1017/iop.2017.85},
	abstract = {Grand et al. (2018) provide a critical treatment of the need for industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists to take active steps to ensure that ours is a robust and reliable science of organizations, the spirit of which the present authors wholeheartedly agree. One path toward ensuring that I-O psychology is rightly recognized as a robust science is by embracing the principles of Open Science. We argue that the move toward Open Science is beneficial for all six of the defining principles outlined by Grand et al. Open Science increases transparency, facilitates replication, and contributes to the accumulation and integration of research by increasing accessibility. Each of these factors helps to foster systematic, rigorous scientific practices, which, in turn, can lead to greater insights and understanding of organizational phenomenon through deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches to theory generation and refinement, ensuring that our field remains relevant for the foreseeable future. In this commentary, we highlight several initiatives that already exist to promote Open Science and explore others only alluded to by Grand et al.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2019-11-01},
	journal = {Industrial and Organizational Psychology},
	author = {McAbee, Samuel T. and Grubbs, Joshua B. and Zickar, Michael J.},
	month = apr,
	year = {2018},
	pages = {54--61},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/joshuab.grubbs/Library/CloudStorage/GoogleDrive-joshuagrubbsphd@gmail.com/My Drive/Manuscripts/Zotero/storage/U6EE8LFY/EE1AA08059145362E95400292EB470A7.html:text/html;Submitted Version:/Users/joshuab.grubbs/Library/CloudStorage/GoogleDrive-joshuagrubbsphd@gmail.com/My Drive/Manuscripts/Zotero/storage/QJSXZKNR/McAbee et al. - 2018 - Open Science Is Robust Science.pdf:application/pdf},
}

Downloads: 1