Male mating effort in a polygynous ungulate

Male mating effort in a polygynous ungulate. Pelletier, F., Hogg, J., T., & Festa-Bianchet, M. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60(5):645-654, Springer Verlag, 9, 2006.

Website doi abstract bibtex

Survival and mating success are key fitness components of mammalian males. Because energy is limited, life history theory predicts trade-offs between current and future reproduction. While many studies have examined fitness trade-off in females, we know little about trade-offs faced by males. In polygynous species, male mating success is largely dependent upon intrasexual competition. Consequently, males have greater uncertainty over the benefits of a given allocation than over its costs, and the correlation between mating effort and success is likely much weaker in males than in females. We analyzed 14 years of data on the mating effort and survival of marked bighorn rams to investigate fitness trade-offs. Dominant rams defended single estrous ewes ("tending") while subordinates attempted to copulate after separating the tending pair ("coursing"). We estimated the participation in tending and coursing for each ram and the effort in searching for breeding opportunities by each ram each year. We compared these three behavioral indices of male mating effort to demographic parameters, individual characteristics, and both yearly and long-term survival. Mating effort during the rut was unrelated to ram overwinter survival, but longevity was positively correlated with mating effort between 2 and 5 years of age. Persistent variation among rams is likely to explain this pattern, suggesting that in natural populations a few high quality males enjoy both high mating success and high survival. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

@article{
 title = {Male mating effort in a polygynous ungulate},
 type = {article},
 year = {2006},
 keywords = {Bighorn sheep,Life history,Male mating effort,Rut,Ungulates},
 pages = {645-654},
 volume = {60},
 websites = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-006-0208-y},
 month = {9},
 publisher = {Springer Verlag},
 day = {10},
 id = {f84c9c80-74b6-3374-8f6b-0160e08b690f},
 created = {2020-01-10T20:59:12.332Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {22e419ab-7898-32a2-a0e2-263b41aa7868},
 last_modified = {2020-01-10T22:05:06.278Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Pelletier2006a},
 source_type = {article},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {Survival and mating success are key fitness components of mammalian males. Because energy is limited, life history theory predicts trade-offs between current and future reproduction. While many studies have examined fitness trade-off in females, we know little about trade-offs faced by males. In polygynous species, male mating success is largely dependent upon intrasexual competition. Consequently, males have greater uncertainty over the benefits of a given allocation than over its costs, and the correlation between mating effort and success is likely much weaker in males than in females. We analyzed 14 years of data on the mating effort and survival of marked bighorn rams to investigate fitness trade-offs. Dominant rams defended single estrous ewes ("tending") while subordinates attempted to copulate after separating the tending pair ("coursing"). We estimated the participation in tending and coursing for each ram and the effort in searching for breeding opportunities by each ram each year. We compared these three behavioral indices of male mating effort to demographic parameters, individual characteristics, and both yearly and long-term survival. Mating effort during the rut was unrelated to ram overwinter survival, but longevity was positively correlated with mating effort between 2 and 5 years of age. Persistent variation among rams is likely to explain this pattern, suggesting that in natural populations a few high quality males enjoy both high mating success and high survival. © Springer-Verlag 2006.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Pelletier, Fanie and Hogg, John T. and Festa-Bianchet, Marco},
 doi = {10.1007/s00265-006-0208-y},
 journal = {Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology},
 number = {5}
}

Downloads: 0