Formal or Functional? Traditional or Inclusive? Bible Translations as Markers of Religious Subcultures

Formal or Functional? Traditional or Inclusive? Bible Translations as Markers of Religious Subcultures. Perry, S. L. & Grubbs, J. B. Sociology of Religion, February, 2020.
doi abstract bibtex

Abstract. English Bible translations are often classified along two axes: (1) whether their translation approach pursues “formal correspondence” (prioritizing

@article{perryFormalFunctionalTraditional2020,
  title = {Formal or {{Functional}}? {{Traditional}} or {{Inclusive}}? {{Bible Translations}} as {{Markers}} of {{Religious Subcultures}}},
  shorttitle = {Formal or {{Functional}}?},
  author = {Perry, Samuel L. and Grubbs, Joshua B.},
  year = {2020},
  month = feb,
  journal = {Sociology of Religion},
  doi = {10.1093/socrel/sraa003},
  abstract = {Abstract.  English Bible translations are often classified along two axes: (1) whether their translation approach pursues “formal correspondence” (prioritizing},
  copyright = {All rights reserved},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Volumes/GoogleDrive/My Drive/Manuscripts/Zotero/storage/NPVC5HVC/Perry and Grubbs - Formal or Functional Traditional or Inclusive Bi.pdf;/Volumes/GoogleDrive/My Drive/Manuscripts/Zotero/storage/L56WMNJ2/Formal_or_Functional_Traditional_or_Inclusive_Bible_Translations_as_Markers_of_Religious_Subcul.html;/Volumes/GoogleDrive/My Drive/Manuscripts/Zotero/storage/TABMLLLM/5741798.html}
}

Downloads: 0